Marinus Jan Marijs 0103
Question: Would you agree with the idea that non-dual mysticism is non-developmental?
Marijs: No it has some kind of non- of developmental in it, because you have to have certain development to come in contact with this background which is non-dual, but in essence it is non developmental it is always there, is always bin there, it is always be there.
Because it doesn’t, it isn’t within time, it transcends space and time, the other levels of course, levels of emptiness are developmental levels, and Bhava is developmental and the word itself means becoming, so it is already in the word I would say.
An another approach would say that if Nirvana is emptiness, and I think people would agree on that, the different forms of emptiness, the void, then this 3rd form of mysticism is fullness.
If somebody is in Bhava then he functions on mystical level, and on that level then becomes an concentration of energy, of subtle energies, which are highly activated and that is the fullness you could say, there is this body of light, which is experienced by the mystic who is in Bhava Samadhi.
A further point I would to make is there are different forms of Bhava Samadhi.
Basically nature mysticism is pre Bhava, but is in more or less belongs to this 3rd group , it’s a form of fullness, energies are activated, an if you go higher, beyond nature mysticism, you have 4 different forms of Bhava Samadhi, one is the Bhava Samadhi on a low subtle level, one is a Bhava Samadhi on a high subtle level an other one is Bhava Samadhi on a low causal level and an another one is a Bhava Samadhi on a high causal level.
So there are next to nature mysticism, 4 different distinct forms of Bhava Samadhi.
<<< back